Game result data thanks to the NHL API.
League-Wide Series Outcome Summary (32x32)
|
ANA |
BOS |
BUF |
CGY |
CAR |
CHI |
COL |
CBJ |
DAL |
DET |
EDM |
FLA |
LAK |
MIN |
MTL |
NSH |
NJD |
NYI |
NYR |
OTT |
PHI |
PIT |
SJS |
SEA |
STL |
TBL |
TOR |
UTA |
VAN |
VGK |
WSH |
WPG |
| ANA |
— |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| BOS |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
| BUF |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| CGY |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
— |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| CAR |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| CHI |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
— |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| COL |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L5 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L5 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| CBJ |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
— |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| DAL |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| DET |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
— |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| EDM |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| FLA |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
— |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| LAK |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| MIN |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| MTL |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| NSH |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
— |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| NJD |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
— |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| NYI |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| NYR |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| OTT |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| PHI |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
— |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| PIT |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| SJS |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
— |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| SEA |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| STL |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
| TBL |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| TOR |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
— |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
| UTA |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
| VAN |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
— |
H5 |
H5 |
H5 |
| VGK |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
— |
H7 |
L6 |
| WSH |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
L6 |
L6 |
— |
L6 |
| WPG |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
H5 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H7 |
H5 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
L6 |
H7 |
H5 |
L6 |
H5 |
L6 |
H7 |
H7 |
— |
Fixed first-round pairings set by seeding. Each division's D2 plays D3 within the same division. Each D1 winner faces a wild card team: the higher D1 (more conference points) plays WC2; the lower D1 plays WC1.
Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Edmonton Oilers leads 1–0
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Edmonton Oilers |
● |
8.9% |
17.9% |
17.7% |
18.8% |
63.2% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
0.0% |
9.0% |
14.4% |
13.3% |
36.8% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Boston Bruins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Series tied 1–1
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
0.0% |
18.8% |
18.3% |
20.8% |
57.8% |
| Boston Bruins |
○ |
0.0% |
10.4% |
17.0% |
14.7% |
42.2% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Ottawa Senators
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Carolina Hurricanes leads 2–0
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
9.2% |
19.2% |
18.7% |
21.0% |
68.1% |
| Ottawa Senators |
○ |
0.0% |
0.0% |
17.0% |
14.9% |
31.9% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Colorado Avalanche leads 2–0
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
17.4% |
27.3% |
21.3% |
17.8% |
83.8% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
0.0% |
0.0% |
7.9% |
8.3% |
16.2% |
Dallas Stars vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Series tied 1–1
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
0.0% |
18.2% |
18.1% |
20.6% |
56.9% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
0.0% |
10.8% |
17.2% |
15.1% |
43.1% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Tampa Bay Lightning
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Series tied 1–1
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
0.0% |
13.1% |
14.3% |
18.7% |
46.1% |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
○ |
0.0% |
15.2% |
21.8% |
16.9% |
53.9% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Philadelphia Flyers leads 2–0
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
6.2% |
14.8% |
16.2% |
20.6% |
57.8% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
0.0% |
0.0% |
23.5% |
18.7% |
42.2% |
Vegas Golden Knights vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 100.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
Series tied 1–1
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
● |
0.0% |
14.3% |
15.2% |
19.3% |
48.8% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
0.0% |
14.0% |
20.7% |
16.5% |
51.2% |
Winners from the same bracket half meet in the division semifinals. These are cross-division matchups within the same conference — e.g., a D1 winner (or the WC that beat them) vs. the D2/D3 winner from the same bracket side.
Colorado Avalanche vs Dallas Stars
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 45.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
9.3% |
18.0% |
17.5% |
18.0% |
62.8% |
| Dallas Stars |
○ |
3.9% |
8.0% |
13.0% |
12.3% |
37.2% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Tampa Bay Lightning
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 34.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
5.5% |
13.0% |
13.5% |
17.2% |
49.2% |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
○ |
6.7% |
11.9% |
17.9% |
14.3% |
50.8% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 33.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
12.3% |
21.4% |
19.3% |
17.8% |
70.7% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
2.7% |
5.9% |
10.2% |
10.5% |
29.3% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 33.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
7.9% |
16.6% |
16.2% |
18.2% |
58.8% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
4.6% |
9.0% |
14.7% |
12.9% |
41.2% |
Edmonton Oilers vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 31.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Edmonton Oilers |
● |
5.2% |
12.4% |
13.1% |
16.9% |
47.7% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
7.1% |
12.4% |
18.4% |
14.5% |
52.3% |
Vegas Golden Knights vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 29.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
● |
6.3% |
14.2% |
14.6% |
17.6% |
52.7% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
5.9% |
10.8% |
16.7% |
13.9% |
47.3% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 25.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
10.4% |
19.5% |
18.3% |
18.1% |
66.2% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
3.4% |
7.0% |
11.8% |
11.5% |
33.8% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Montréal Canadiens
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 24.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Montréal Canadiens |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Ottawa Senators vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 23.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
6.2% |
14.1% |
14.4% |
17.5% |
52.2% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
6.0% |
11.0% |
16.9% |
13.9% |
47.8% |
Anaheim Ducks vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 20.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Anaheim Ducks |
● |
3.7% |
9.1% |
11.1% |
14.3% |
38.3% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
9.7% |
16.2% |
20.1% |
15.7% |
61.7% |
Vegas Golden Knights vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 19.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
● |
8.5% |
17.1% |
16.9% |
18.0% |
60.5% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
4.3% |
8.6% |
13.8% |
12.7% |
39.5% |
Ottawa Senators vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 17.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
7.5% |
16.0% |
15.9% |
18.0% |
57.3% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
4.9% |
9.5% |
15.1% |
13.2% |
42.7% |
Dallas Stars vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 11.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
12.2% |
21.4% |
19.2% |
17.8% |
70.6% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
2.7% |
5.9% |
10.3% |
10.5% |
29.4% |
Minnesota Wild vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 8.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
9.9% |
19.1% |
17.8% |
18.3% |
65.1% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
3.5% |
7.3% |
12.4% |
11.7% |
34.9% |
The winner of the higher bracket half meets the winner of the lower bracket half to decide the conference champion.
Colorado Avalanche vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 14.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
14.2% |
23.9% |
19.6% |
17.7% |
75.4% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
2.1% |
4.7% |
8.9% |
8.9% |
24.6% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 14.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
14.1% |
23.8% |
19.6% |
17.7% |
75.1% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
2.1% |
4.7% |
9.0% |
9.0% |
24.9% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Tampa Bay Lightning
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 11.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
6.4% |
14.3% |
14.7% |
17.6% |
53.0% |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
○ |
5.8% |
10.8% |
16.5% |
13.9% |
47.0% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Buffalo Sabres
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 11.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
7.0% |
15.3% |
15.2% |
18.0% |
55.4% |
| Buffalo Sabres |
○ |
5.3% |
10.0% |
15.9% |
13.4% |
44.6% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 8.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
7.5% |
16.0% |
15.9% |
18.0% |
57.3% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
4.9% |
9.5% |
15.1% |
13.2% |
42.7% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 7.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
16.4% |
25.7% |
20.2% |
16.8% |
79.2% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
1.7% |
3.8% |
7.5% |
7.9% |
20.8% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 7.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
6.9% |
15.2% |
15.1% |
18.0% |
55.2% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
5.3% |
10.0% |
16.0% |
13.4% |
44.8% |
Dallas Stars vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 7.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
9.0% |
17.4% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.6% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.3% |
12.6% |
38.4% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Montréal Canadiens
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 7.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
8.2% |
16.8% |
16.5% |
18.1% |
59.6% |
| Montréal Canadiens |
○ |
4.5% |
8.8% |
14.3% |
12.8% |
40.4% |
Dallas Stars vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 6.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
8.8% |
17.3% |
17.2% |
17.9% |
61.3% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
4.2% |
8.5% |
13.4% |
12.7% |
38.7% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Boston Bruins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 6.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
9.0% |
17.4% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.6% |
| Boston Bruins |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.3% |
12.6% |
38.4% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 5.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
9.1% |
17.7% |
17.4% |
18.0% |
62.2% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
4.0% |
8.2% |
13.1% |
12.5% |
37.8% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
6.3% |
14.1% |
14.5% |
17.5% |
52.4% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
5.9% |
10.9% |
16.8% |
13.9% |
47.6% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
8.8% |
17.3% |
17.2% |
17.9% |
61.3% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
4.2% |
8.5% |
13.4% |
12.7% |
38.7% |
Minnesota Wild vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Boston Bruins vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
5.5% |
13.0% |
13.5% |
17.2% |
49.2% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
6.7% |
11.9% |
17.9% |
14.3% |
50.8% |
Minnesota Wild vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
7.1% |
15.4% |
15.3% |
17.9% |
55.7% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
5.3% |
9.9% |
15.7% |
13.4% |
44.3% |
Dallas Stars vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
12.6% |
22.0% |
19.3% |
17.8% |
71.7% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
2.6% |
5.6% |
10.0% |
10.1% |
28.3% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Boston Bruins vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
6.9% |
15.1% |
15.3% |
17.8% |
55.1% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
5.4% |
10.1% |
15.8% |
13.6% |
44.9% |
Minnesota Wild vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
9.6% |
18.3% |
17.9% |
17.9% |
63.6% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
3.8% |
7.8% |
12.6% |
12.2% |
36.4% |
Utah Mammoth vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Utah Mammoth |
● |
10.3% |
19.4% |
18.1% |
18.1% |
65.9% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
3.4% |
7.1% |
12.0% |
11.5% |
34.1% |
Eastern Conference champion vs. Western Conference champion.
Colorado Avalanche vs Carolina Hurricanes
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 8.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
8.8% |
17.3% |
17.2% |
17.9% |
61.3% |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
○ |
4.2% |
8.5% |
13.4% |
12.7% |
38.7% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Tampa Bay Lightning
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 6.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
9.1% |
17.7% |
17.4% |
18.0% |
62.2% |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
○ |
4.0% |
8.2% |
13.1% |
12.5% |
37.8% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Buffalo Sabres
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 6.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
10.4% |
19.5% |
18.3% |
18.1% |
66.2% |
| Buffalo Sabres |
○ |
3.4% |
7.0% |
11.8% |
11.5% |
33.8% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 4.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
11.9% |
20.9% |
19.2% |
17.7% |
69.8% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
2.8% |
6.2% |
10.5% |
10.7% |
30.2% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Ottawa Senators
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
11.6% |
20.7% |
19.0% |
17.9% |
69.2% |
| Ottawa Senators |
○ |
2.9% |
6.3% |
10.8% |
10.8% |
30.8% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Montréal Canadiens
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
12.2% |
21.4% |
19.2% |
17.8% |
70.6% |
| Montréal Canadiens |
○ |
2.7% |
5.9% |
10.3% |
10.5% |
29.4% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Dallas Stars
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
6.6% |
14.7% |
14.8% |
17.8% |
53.9% |
| Dallas Stars |
○ |
5.6% |
10.4% |
16.4% |
13.7% |
46.1% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Boston Bruins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 3.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
13.5% |
23.4% |
19.3% |
18.0% |
74.2% |
| Boston Bruins |
○ |
2.3% |
4.9% |
9.4% |
9.2% |
25.8% |
Dallas Stars vs Tampa Bay Lightning
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
5.9% |
13.5% |
14.0% |
17.3% |
50.6% |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
○ |
6.4% |
11.5% |
17.4% |
14.2% |
49.4% |
Dallas Stars vs Buffalo Sabres
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
6.4% |
14.3% |
14.6% |
17.6% |
52.8% |
| Buffalo Sabres |
○ |
5.9% |
10.8% |
16.7% |
13.9% |
47.2% |
Colorado Avalanche vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Colorado Avalanche |
● |
14.3% |
24.0% |
19.6% |
17.6% |
75.6% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
2.1% |
4.6% |
8.8% |
8.9% |
24.4% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
8.5% |
17.1% |
16.9% |
18.0% |
60.5% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
4.3% |
8.6% |
13.8% |
12.7% |
39.5% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 2.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
9.3% |
17.9% |
17.6% |
17.9% |
62.7% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
3.9% |
8.1% |
12.9% |
12.4% |
37.3% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
10.0% |
18.6% |
18.2% |
17.8% |
64.5% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
3.6% |
7.6% |
12.2% |
12.1% |
35.5% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
7.7% |
16.4% |
16.0% |
18.2% |
58.4% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
4.7% |
9.1% |
14.9% |
12.9% |
41.6% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
8.4% |
17.0% |
16.8% |
18.0% |
60.3% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
4.4% |
8.7% |
13.9% |
12.8% |
39.7% |
Dallas Stars vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
9.1% |
17.7% |
17.4% |
18.0% |
62.2% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
4.0% |
8.2% |
13.1% |
12.5% |
37.8% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
9.0% |
17.4% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.6% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.3% |
12.6% |
38.4% |
Dallas Stars vs Ottawa Senators
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
7.1% |
15.5% |
15.3% |
18.1% |
56.0% |
| Ottawa Senators |
○ |
5.2% |
9.8% |
15.8% |
13.3% |
44.0% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
7.7% |
16.4% |
16.0% |
18.2% |
58.4% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
4.7% |
9.1% |
14.9% |
12.9% |
41.6% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
7.1% |
15.5% |
15.3% |
18.1% |
56.0% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
5.2% |
9.8% |
15.8% |
13.3% |
44.0% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
8.8% |
17.3% |
17.2% |
17.9% |
61.3% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
4.2% |
8.5% |
13.4% |
12.7% |
38.7% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
8.8% |
17.3% |
17.2% |
17.9% |
61.1% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
4.2% |
8.5% |
13.5% |
12.7% |
38.9% |
Dallas Stars vs Montréal Canadiens
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
7.5% |
16.0% |
15.9% |
18.0% |
57.3% |
| Montréal Canadiens |
○ |
4.9% |
9.5% |
15.1% |
13.2% |
42.7% |
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
● |
6.1% |
13.9% |
14.4% |
17.4% |
51.8% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
6.1% |
11.1% |
16.9% |
14.0% |
48.2% |
Dallas Stars vs Boston Bruins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
8.2% |
16.8% |
16.5% |
18.1% |
59.6% |
| Boston Bruins |
○ |
4.5% |
8.8% |
14.3% |
12.8% |
40.4% |
Ottawa Senators vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
6.2% |
14.1% |
14.4% |
17.6% |
52.4% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
6.0% |
10.9% |
16.8% |
13.9% |
47.6% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
6.2% |
14.1% |
14.4% |
17.5% |
52.2% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
6.0% |
11.0% |
16.9% |
13.9% |
47.8% |
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
● |
7.5% |
16.0% |
15.9% |
18.0% |
57.3% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
4.9% |
9.5% |
15.1% |
13.2% |
42.7% |
Ottawa Senators vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
7.5% |
16.0% |
15.9% |
18.0% |
57.3% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
4.9% |
9.5% |
15.1% |
13.2% |
42.7% |
Minnesota Wild vs Pittsburgh Penguins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
6.0% |
13.7% |
14.1% |
17.4% |
51.2% |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
○ |
6.2% |
11.3% |
17.2% |
14.1% |
48.8% |
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Ottawa Senators vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Dallas Stars vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 1.0% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Dallas Stars |
● |
9.0% |
17.4% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.6% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.3% |
12.6% |
38.4% |
Boston Bruins vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
5.6% |
13.1% |
13.7% |
17.2% |
49.7% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
6.6% |
11.8% |
17.7% |
14.3% |
50.3% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
7.1% |
15.5% |
15.3% |
18.1% |
56.0% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
5.2% |
9.8% |
15.8% |
13.3% |
44.0% |
Minnesota Wild vs Ottawa Senators
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
5.9% |
13.5% |
14.1% |
17.3% |
50.7% |
| Ottawa Senators |
○ |
6.3% |
11.5% |
17.3% |
14.2% |
49.3% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.9% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
7.0% |
15.3% |
15.2% |
18.0% |
55.4% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
5.3% |
10.0% |
15.9% |
13.4% |
44.6% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
13.6% |
23.5% |
19.3% |
17.9% |
74.3% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
2.2% |
4.9% |
9.3% |
9.2% |
25.7% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Minnesota Wild
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
6.3% |
14.1% |
14.5% |
17.5% |
52.4% |
| Minnesota Wild |
○ |
5.9% |
10.9% |
16.8% |
13.9% |
47.6% |
Boston Bruins vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.8% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
6.7% |
14.9% |
14.9% |
17.8% |
54.4% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
5.5% |
10.3% |
16.2% |
13.6% |
45.6% |
Boston Bruins vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
6.4% |
14.3% |
14.7% |
17.6% |
53.0% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
5.8% |
10.8% |
16.5% |
13.9% |
47.0% |
Minnesota Wild vs Boston Bruins
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
6.6% |
14.6% |
14.8% |
17.7% |
53.8% |
| Boston Bruins |
○ |
5.6% |
10.5% |
16.4% |
13.7% |
46.2% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
13.2% |
22.9% |
19.3% |
17.9% |
73.3% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
2.4% |
5.2% |
9.6% |
9.6% |
26.7% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Utah Mammoth
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
5.1% |
12.3% |
13.0% |
16.8% |
47.2% |
| Utah Mammoth |
○ |
7.2% |
12.6% |
18.5% |
14.5% |
52.8% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.7% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
11.5% |
20.6% |
18.8% |
18.0% |
68.9% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
3.0% |
6.4% |
10.9% |
10.9% |
31.1% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Edmonton Oilers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
6.1% |
13.8% |
14.3% |
17.4% |
51.6% |
| Edmonton Oilers |
○ |
6.1% |
11.2% |
17.0% |
14.1% |
48.4% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Vegas Golden Knights
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.6% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
5.8% |
13.2% |
13.9% |
17.1% |
50.1% |
| Vegas Golden Knights |
○ |
6.5% |
11.7% |
17.5% |
14.3% |
49.9% |
Minnesota Wild vs Philadelphia Flyers
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Minnesota Wild |
● |
7.2% |
15.6% |
15.4% |
18.1% |
56.3% |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
○ |
5.1% |
9.7% |
15.6% |
13.2% |
43.7% |
Carolina Hurricanes vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Carolina Hurricanes |
● |
13.6% |
23.5% |
19.3% |
18.0% |
74.4% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
2.2% |
4.9% |
9.4% |
9.2% |
25.6% |
Tampa Bay Lightning vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.5% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Tampa Bay Lightning |
● |
13.1% |
22.8% |
19.3% |
17.9% |
73.2% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
2.4% |
5.2% |
9.7% |
9.6% |
26.8% |
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
● |
9.7% |
18.3% |
17.9% |
17.8% |
63.8% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
3.7% |
7.8% |
12.5% |
12.2% |
36.2% |
Ottawa Senators vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
9.7% |
18.3% |
17.9% |
17.8% |
63.8% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
3.7% |
7.8% |
12.5% |
12.2% |
36.2% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
9.7% |
18.3% |
17.9% |
17.8% |
63.8% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
3.7% |
7.8% |
12.5% |
12.2% |
36.2% |
Buffalo Sabres vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.4% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Buffalo Sabres |
● |
11.6% |
20.7% |
19.0% |
17.9% |
69.2% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
2.9% |
6.3% |
10.8% |
10.8% |
30.8% |
Pittsburgh Penguins vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Pittsburgh Penguins |
● |
10.4% |
19.5% |
18.3% |
18.1% |
66.2% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
3.4% |
7.0% |
11.8% |
11.5% |
33.8% |
Boston Bruins vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
9.0% |
17.4% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.6% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.3% |
12.6% |
38.4% |
Ottawa Senators vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Ottawa Senators |
● |
10.4% |
19.5% |
18.3% |
18.1% |
66.2% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
3.4% |
7.0% |
11.8% |
11.5% |
33.8% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Anaheim Ducks
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.3% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
8.5% |
17.1% |
16.9% |
18.0% |
60.5% |
| Anaheim Ducks |
○ |
4.3% |
8.6% |
13.8% |
12.7% |
39.5% |
Montréal Canadiens vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Montréal Canadiens |
● |
10.3% |
19.4% |
18.1% |
18.1% |
65.9% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
3.4% |
7.1% |
12.0% |
11.6% |
34.1% |
Boston Bruins vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.2% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Boston Bruins |
● |
9.0% |
17.5% |
17.4% |
17.8% |
61.7% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
4.1% |
8.4% |
13.2% |
12.6% |
38.3% |
Philadelphia Flyers vs Los Angeles Kings
P(matchup occurs) ≈ 0.1% | ● = higher seed (home-ice advantage)
| Team |
|
4 gms | 5 gms | 6 gms | 7 gms |
TOTAL |
| Philadelphia Flyers |
● |
8.2% |
16.8% |
16.5% |
18.1% |
59.6% |
| Los Angeles Kings |
○ |
4.5% |
8.8% |
14.3% |
12.8% |
40.4% |